Any man who wears a wig is a fag in my opinion.
I can name more former members of Steppenwolf than faggots on this list:
http://www.legionmagazine.com/en/ind...itary-leaders/
Washington handily defeated the British in several spectacular engagements utilizing gambits that could be described as nothing short of "ballsy", all with an army that was little more than a peasant levy mixed with some hardassed frontiersmen. Most of the battles that he lost and territory that he ceded were intentional, a part of his overall campaign strategy. Only on the internet could a man like this be defined as anything less than a great general.
He was fighting an opponent who had to battle scurvy on the way over, dressed in flaming red jackets, and only stuck to major roads.
His force blended into the scenery, knew the terrain like the backs of their hand, and were skilled in guerilla warfare. PLUS they could count on support from the local population for food, clothing, etc. and they STILL almost starved to death.
Originally Posted by Scrapper
Originally Posted by SoulMechanic
lol
the old "WASHINGTON DIDN'T FIGHT FAIR!" argument?
"Skilled in guerrilla warfare"? They were fucking farmers and blacksmiths, not a standing army with all the support which that brings.His force blended into the scenery, knew the terrain like the backs of their hand, and were skilled in guerilla warfare. PLUS they could count on support from the local population for food, clothing, etc. and they STILL almost starved to death.
Plus the British Forces tried to steal everything they could from the local population.