Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: 65 million dollar lawsuit over lost pants.

  1. #1
    Registered Member mrblackmagic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,055


    Yes | No

    Default 65 million dollar lawsuit over lost pants.

    I heard this story on the Today Show and I thought I'd spread the misery.

    Lawyer's Price For Missing Pants: $65 Million

    By Marc Fisher
    Thursday, April 26, 2007; B01

    When the neighborhood dry cleaner misplaced Roy Pearson's pants, he took action. He complained. He demanded compensation. And then he sued. Man, did he sue.

    Two years, thousands of pages of legal documents and many hundreds of hours of investigative work later, Pearson is seeking to make Custom Cleaners pay -- would you believe more than the payroll of the entire Washington Nationals roster?

    He says he deserves millions for the damages he suffered by not getting his pants back, for his litigation costs, for "mental suffering, inconvenience and discomfort," for the value of the time he has spent on the lawsuit, for leasing a car every weekend for 10 years and for a replacement suit, according to court papers.

    Pearson is demanding $65,462,500. The original alteration work on the pants cost $10.50.

    By the way, Pearson is a lawyer. Okay, you probably figured that. But get this: He's a judge, too -- an administrative law judge for the District of Columbia.

    I'm telling you, they need to start selling tickets down at the courthouse.

    Oh, where to start: How about the car? Why should Ki, Jin and Soo Chung -- the family that owns Custom Cleaners on Bladensburg Road NE in the District's Fort Lincoln section -- pay Pearson $15,000 so he can rent a car every weekend for 10 years?

    The plaintiff, who says he has devoted more than 1,000 hours to represent himself in this battle, says that as a result of poor service at Custom, he must find another cleaner. And because Pearson does not own a car, he says he will have to rent one to get his clothes taken care of.

    Back to the beginning. In 2002, Custom lost a pair of pants that Pearson had put in for cleaning. One week after the error was discovered, Custom gave Pearson a check for $150 for new pants. A few days later, the Chungs, Korean immigrants who live in Virginia and own three D.C. cleaners, told Pearson that he was no longer welcome at their store. That dispute was eventually put aside, and Pearson continued to use the company.

    Move ahead to 2005, when Pearson got a new job as a judge. He needed to wear a suit to work every day. He dug out his five Hickey Freeman suits and found them to be "uncomfortably tight." He asked Custom to let the waists out two or three inches. Worried that he might be up against his Visa card limit, he took the suits in for alterations one or two at a time.

    According to a statement filed by both parties in the lawsuit, Pearson dropped off one pair of pants May 3 so he could wear them to his new job May 6. But on May 5, the pants weren't ready. Soo Chung promised them for early the next morning, but when Pearson arrived, the pants weren't there.

    At this point, I should let you in on the subject of hundreds of pages of legal wrangling. Custom Cleaners at that time had two big signs on its walls. One said "Satisfaction Guaranteed," and the other said, "Same Day Service."

    Pearson relied on these signs. Deeply.

    He was not satisfied. And he did not get his pants back on the same day or, for that matter, on any day.

    This, he says, amounts to fraud, negligence and a scam.

    A week after that routine mishap -- pants go astray all the time at cleaners -- Soo Chung came up with gray trousers that she said were Pearson's. But when the judge said that he had dropped off pants with red and blue pinstripes, there was no joy in Fort Lincoln.

    Pearson's first letter to the Chungs sought $1,150 so he could buy a new suit. Two lawyers and many legal bills later, the Chungs offered Pearson $3,000, then $4,600 and, finally, says their attorney, Chris Manning, $12,000 to settle the case.

    But Pearson pushes on. How does he get to $65 million? The District's consumer protection law provides for damages of $1,500 per violation per day. Pearson started multiplying: 12 violations over 1,200 days, times three defendants. A pant leg here, a pant leg there, and soon, you're talking $65 million.

    The case, set for trial in June, is on its second judge. The Chungs have removed the signs upon which Pearson's case rests.

    "This case shocks me on a daily basis," Manning says. "Pearson has a lot of time on his hands, and the Chungs have been abused in a ghastly way. It's going to cost them tens of thousands to defend this case."

    A judge in the case has admonished Pearson about his take-no-prisoners tactics. When Pearson sought to broaden the case to try to prove violations of consumer protection laws on behalf of all District residents, D.C. Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz said that "the court has significant concerns that the plaintiff is acting in bad faith" because of "the breathtaking magnitude of the expansion he seeks."

    Pearson has put the Chungs and their attorneys to work answering long lists of questions, such as this: "Please identify by name, full address and telephone number, all cleaners known to you on May 1, 2005 in the District of Columbia, the United States and the world that advertise 'SATISFACTION GUARANTEED.' "

    In the world.

    The answer: "None."

    In a closet of a lawyer's office in downtown Washington, there is a pair of gray wool pants, waiting to be picked up by Roy Pearson.

    "We believe the pants are his," Manning says. "The tag matches his receipt."


    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...502763_pf.html

    BTW Al Roker is God.
    Last edited by mrblackmagic; 2nd May 07 at 08:47 AM.

  2. #2
    Registered Member Shu2jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    353


    Yes | No

    Default

    I think he is sueing the wrong people. He should be sueing the doctor who dropped him on his head when was born.

  3. #3
    Shawarma
    Guest Shawarma's Avatar


    Yes | No

    Default

    He should be sueing somebody who actually had money. Dumbass.

  4. #4
    Mrs. Robinson Photobucket Kiko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    18,132


    Yes | No

    Default

    From the same story, different source

    "He brought one pair in for alterations and they went missing -- gray trousers with what Pearson described in court papers as blue and red stripes on them."

    He's not just a jerk, he dresses like a clown.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce View Post
    We all have our respective crosses to bear.... We all have flaws and virtues, and frequently our virtues are bound up with our flaws. And those characteristics are all magnified when one takes charge of a quarrelsome Internet forum.
    for example....
    Quote Originally Posted by Yiktin Voxbane View Post
    It's the rough end of the pineapple for you Mon ami .

  5. #5
    Mr. Hurty Pants Yiktin Voxbane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    8,165


    Yes | No

    Default

    Heh .... Clown Jerk .... Bizzare circus olympics weightlifting ?

    2 x Herschel Krustoffskys with a lift bar between them ..
    Thank GOD I'm an Atheist .


  6. #6
    Senior Member Question!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    243


    Yes | No

    Default

    Fuck that guy. He should be put down immediately.

  7. #7
    Registered Member AAAhmed46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,216


    Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shawarma
    He should be sueing somebody who actually had money. Dumbass.
    LOLZ

  8. #8
    Science Fucker Photobucket WarPhalange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    22,801


    Yes | No

    Default

    I am now in favor of the death penalty. Via skinning alive.

  9. #9
    not long for this world nihilist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    36,605


    Yes | No

    Default

    Just how much money does that fucking clown need?

  10. #10
    Catnip fiend. Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    18,485


    Yes | No

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by THX-1138
    Just how much money does that fucking clown need?
    A judge working the legal system?

    Don't get me started on how Congress can vote for it's own raises...
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiko
    Steve wasn't in CTC but he's one of us in spirit. I can't explain it.
    <3

    SHARK FARTS!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
◮ Top