PDA

View Full Version : Iran did 911 says US court!



Dr. Socially Liberal Fiscally Conservative Vermin
28th December 11, 06:04 AM
U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, December 23, 2011

NEW YORK, December 23, 2011 /PRNewswire/ --

A federal district court in Manhattan yesterday entered a historic ruling that
reveals new facts about Iran's support of al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks. U.S.
District Judge George B. Daniels ruled yesterday that Iran and Hezbollah
materially and directly supported al Qaeda in the September 11, 2001 attacks
and are legally responsible for damages to hundreds of family members of 9/11
victims who are plaintiffs in the case.

Judge Daniels had announced his ruling in Havlish, et al. v. bin
Laden, et al. , in open court on Thursday, December 15, 2011, following a
three-hour courtroom presentation by the families' attorneys. Judge Daniels
entered a written Order of Judgment yesterday backed by 53 pages of detailed
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

Fiona Havlish, whose husband Donald perished in the World Trade Center North
Tower on 9/11 said, "This is a historic day. For ten years we've wanted the
truth to be known about who was responsible for our losses. Now we have that
answer."


U.S. District Court Rules Iran Behind 9/11 Attacks (http://www.bloomberg.com/article/2011-12-23/aYoOcZ6NT3wo.html)

Make your mind up Amerikka...

Cullion
28th December 11, 06:14 AM
Well, that should kill the myth of an independent judiciary in the minds of a few more Americans, at least.

Fearless Ukemi
28th December 11, 09:58 AM
Just on time now that we are leaving Iraq. 9-11 seems to be the gift that keeps on giving.

Cullion
28th December 11, 10:19 AM
The backstories of films like Robocop and Bladerunner seem more plausible to me every year.

Ajamil
28th December 11, 10:58 AM
You mean global corporatism?

And what does this really do? Are we one step closer to another war in the Middle East, or is this just something for politicians and talking heads to get flabbergasted over? We're not really expecting Iran to pay us for anything, are we?

AAAAAA
28th December 11, 11:22 AM
This is clearly to accustom the public to the next big foreign policy move "For Freedom and Justice".









That's right. The USA is going to sue Iran!

OZZ
28th December 11, 11:48 AM
What a joke..

Commodore Pipes
28th December 11, 04:26 PM
See, this is the sort of thing that makes me want to become one of those crazy conspiracy-theory gun nuts.

Fearless Ukemi
28th December 11, 06:02 PM
You don't have to believe in reptilians and aliens to see that governments are in collusion with the wealthiest corporations who all profit heavily from more wars and from usury.

And that pretty much all of our congress men and women profit from insider trading all day long.

Fearless Ukemi
28th December 11, 06:15 PM
I can't even see how the New World Order is even considered a CT anymore. The push for global government is in your faces all day now with the consolidation of power into the hands of a few. All the reptilians and HAARP shit is just a turd in the punch bowl.

Spade: The Real Snake
28th December 11, 07:10 PM
So are we turning this into Raghead-Whack-A-Mole or what?

danno
29th December 11, 04:14 AM
if america goes to war with iran, i'm giving up and moving to mars.

Ajamil
29th December 11, 09:18 AM
I hear they have strict customs laws over there.

V17duGlHEYY

Spade: The Real Snake
29th December 11, 11:26 AM
If US goes to war with Iran, I'm moving to Australia

Spade: The Real Snake
29th December 11, 11:52 AM
Pansy.

It will be another protracted 10 yr. "nice" war with an all volunteer army that is tired of this Iraq and Afghan shit. Enlistment will drop and they might turn to the draft and, unlike you, I like my kid and he doesn't live in Canada.

Cullion
29th December 11, 12:55 PM
Pansy.

If the US goes to war with Iran, I am going to buy some dirt from Iran and put it out in my yard for the neighbors dog to poop on every day.

I hope you have a suitcase full of bullion coins hidden under that couch, because if the US invades Iran, you aren't going to be buying any foreign real estate with those worthless paper Uncle Sams.

Cullion
29th December 11, 01:15 PM
This is a pretty silly prediction. Think of all of the infrastructure contracts US companies will get after the invasion is over.

That will be a tiny proportion of the cost of the military campaign, the shock in oil prices and foreign governments ditching the dollar in disgust.



I don't think it would do much more to the economy than the last few wars have done.

Exactly.
Exactly.

Fearless Ukemi
29th December 11, 01:15 PM
This is a pretty silly prediction. Think of all of the infrastructure contracts US companies will get after the invasion is over. I don't think it would do much more to the economy than the last few wars have done.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/28/shutting-down-oil-exports-easier-than-drinking-a-glass-of-water-iran-navy-chief/

Have you considered the immediate ramifications if this were to happen?

Cullion
29th December 11, 01:20 PM
Yes, the ramifications to Iran. They would be silly to do so. All they have to do is allow more visibility into their nuclear program. They are like a spoiled child.

Nice trolljob.

billy sol hurok
30th December 11, 07:42 AM
8172

resolve
12th January 12, 08:38 AM
Look, some high-minded people can see the long term benefits of war.

It's worth the risk.

Then you go and fight. I'm tired of seeing my friends come home torn to bits or in caskets.

lant3rn
12th January 12, 08:46 AM
What nob is saying is that he would enjoy being strapped to a large fallus shaped object and rocketed off into the unknown

OZZ
30th January 12, 02:28 PM
Iran mocks US government with this latest gesture :
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/video/economy-18773128/iran-sends-pink-toy-model-of-u-s-drone-to-obama-28069964.html

Phrost
30th January 12, 03:51 PM
Something's hokey about this. Anyone can publish an article to PRNewswire... and Bloomberg picked it up and ran with it unedited?

OZZ
2nd February 12, 11:54 AM
One of the assassinations I read about was like something out of a 007 movie. The Nuclear Scientist was driving along, a motorcycle speeds up beside him and the driver ( with tinted, full-face helmet, for certain) attaches a bomb to the scientist's car..a few blocks later - BOOM !
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/iran-could-attack-inside-u-062609945.html
The Iranians suspect the Israeli Secret Service of carrying out the murders of several people involved in their nuclear energy program.

Bruiser
2nd February 12, 12:31 PM
Fuck. I know I'm going to be drafted.

jkdbuck76
2nd February 12, 12:37 PM
The backstories of films like Robocop and Bladerunner seem more plausible to me every year.

Deckard was NOT a #@#ing replicant!!!!

I bet Iran is behind that TURD of a theory, too.

OZZ
5th February 12, 11:36 PM
Things are getting pretty volatile..
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/iran-says-attack-country-used-strike-soil-124225174.html

When the US Dept. Of defense is quoted as saying that Israel is going to attack within months...I think its a safe bet this isn't just posturing over there any more.
There is going to be another war.
But this time Israel is going to attack.

Bruiser
6th February 12, 12:08 AM
If it was only Israel we wouldn't be building a massive flotilla in the gulf.

OZZ
6th February 12, 10:49 AM
Oh, I fully expect the USA and perhaps a few other Western Nations to be involved. But this time it will be the Israelis who initiate things.

Lollius Urbicus
6th February 12, 01:16 PM
I'm pretty certain Israel and the US aren't going to go to war with Iran, for the simple reason that they're both already at war with Iran.

Stuxxnet
Professional assassinations of key nuclear scientists
Getting arms dealers to sell them dodgy or deliberately defective equipment.
Sponsoring existing internal separatist and terrorist groups

Cullion
6th February 12, 03:24 PM
I'm pretty certain Israel and the US aren't going to go to war with Iran, for the simple reason that they're both already at war with Iran.

Stuxxnet
Professional assassinations of key nuclear scientists
Getting arms dealers to sell them dodgy or deliberately defective equipment.
Sponsoring existing internal separatist and terrorist groups

I think he means 'war'-war, not cyperpunk novel nerd-war

resolve
7th February 12, 04:41 PM
not cyperpunk novel nerd-war

That's how we soften them up these days... :/

Dr. Socially Liberal Fiscally Conservative Vermin
9th February 12, 05:23 AM
Deckard was NOT a #@#ing replicant!!!!


Oh yes he was!!!

Ajamil
9th February 12, 04:53 PM
Why does it affect who he was?

Dr. Socially Liberal Fiscally Conservative Vermin
10th February 12, 08:21 AM
who was he?

OZZ
10th February 12, 09:39 AM
Deckard was a replicant ?
Just because of one scene with a unicorn that was edited out of the original release ?
Mind you, I haven't read Phillip K.Dick's novel.

Dr. Socially Liberal Fiscally Conservative Vermin
10th February 12, 09:59 AM
Its nothing like the film.

Ajamil
10th February 12, 10:05 AM
Deckard was a retirer of replicants who loved his Cantonese food.

Vieux Normand
10th February 12, 11:14 AM
Deckard was NOT a #@#ing replicant!!!!

Because androids don't dream of unicorns--dreams that their bosses know all about.

Dr. Socially Liberal Fiscally Conservative Vermin
10th February 12, 11:52 AM
Deckard was a retirer of replicants who loved his Cantonese food.

Who just happened to be a replicant

Ajamil
10th February 12, 11:55 AM
So he was created at 30 instead of at 1. Why do I care? I only knew him for a few weeks.

"It's too bad he won't live, but then again who does?"

Cullion
10th February 12, 05:02 PM
I think he was a replicant.

OZZ
10th February 12, 10:46 PM
I think he was a replicant.

A replicant with an ex wife..
Hmmm...remember the line " Cold fish..that's what my ex wife called me."
Maybe he was a replicant.

OZZ
10th February 12, 10:47 PM
Because androids don't dream of unicorns--dreams that their bosses know all about.

Yes.
That seals it..he was a replicant.

Ajamil
11th February 12, 07:40 AM
Hrmm, it does add a bit of twist depth to appreciate. Like The Sixth Sense but without a reveal.

Cullion
11th February 12, 08:28 AM
A replicant with an ex wife..
Hmmm...remember the line " Cold fish..that's what my ex wife called me."
Maybe he was a replicant.

Yeah, he has really clear memories of that ex-wife.

Oh, wait.

Commodore Pipes
11th February 12, 01:12 PM
Which version are we talking about?

OZZ
12th February 12, 11:11 AM
Yeah, he has really clear memories of that ex-wife.

Oh, wait.

I wasn't being sarcastic...
The ex-wife thing is a good clue.
If he was a ' cold fish ' ..that would make sense because he supposedly has no emotions.