PDA

View Full Version : USAF developing Gay bomb



Cullion
5th October 07, 06:21 PM
The USAF has been funding chemical weapons research to drive enemy troops wildly, uncontrollably gay. I'm not shitting you. I wouldn't shit you. Come on now, this is Cullion talking.

Um.. ok, just read.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7026150.stm

Sun Wukong
5th October 07, 07:01 PM
most awesome invention ever.

Mister X
5th October 07, 07:12 PM
HOLY FUCK THIS IS OLD

Cullion
5th October 07, 07:19 PM
I don't want to hear any jokes about have they've been testing it in Europe for the last 30 years. Srsly.

Olorin
5th October 07, 07:25 PM
I was in a club on Bourbon Street and they had a drink called a "Gay Bomb."

Mister X
5th October 07, 07:25 PM
Oh well it does explain Numa-Numa then...

Cullion
5th October 07, 07:49 PM
What I'm unsue about is why they took it as read that being forcefully and flamboyantly gay would ender the other side unable to fight. Considering what we know about the Spartans....

WarPhalange
5th October 07, 09:09 PM
I don't want to hear any jokes about have they've been testing it in Europe for the last 30 years. Srsly.

Actually, it looks like they've been testing it on Republicans recently.

Arhetton
5th October 07, 09:12 PM
Have you been on PWOT? One of my favourite sites :)


(a comedy site that featured that as a joke in one of its articles)

NoMan
6th October 07, 12:06 AM
Does it only work on same sex troops? If there were females in the group, would they go after men or would they go after other women? If they go after women, I could bomb the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit photoshoots and have the biggest lesbian orgy ever! Go ahead Department of Homeland Security, give me a color code for that threat.

Steve
6th October 07, 12:12 AM
Actually, it looks like they've been testing it on Republicans recently.

Well played, sir.

Dagon Akujin
6th October 07, 01:28 AM
The US Air Force received the Ig Nobel Peace Prize for their research: http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,22535169-5005369,00.html


"Peace Prize" - The Air Force Wright Laboratory, Dayton, Ohio for instigating research and development on a chemical weapon, the so-called "gay bomb," that "will make enemy soldiers become sexually irresistible to each other".

TM
6th October 07, 12:49 PM
I didn't read the article. Are they parachuting sailors in or did they rediscover Tee Hee Hee from the Fat Freddys' Cat comics?

krazy kaju
6th October 07, 05:34 PM
Actually, this is pretty old news.

US Military Pondering "Gay Bomb" (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4174519.stm)


Does it only work on same sex troops? If there were females in the group, would they go after men or would they go after other women? If they go after women, I could bomb the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit photoshoots and have the biggest lesbian orgy ever! Go ahead Department of Homeland Security, give me a color code for that threat.

Rainbow?

Cullion
6th October 07, 05:37 PM
I know it's old news, but it's not old here you kunts.

bad credit
6th October 07, 06:57 PM
I believe homeland insecurity would call it code pink.

The gay bomb is the height of hypocrisy. According to the right wing, gays can't get married or enjoy rights the rest of us have, like health insurance. Oh, wait, I don't have health insurance, either. But we can turn Abdul into a gay and then bomb him when he's too busy sucking cock to shoot back.

I hope to Gawd that this gets built, and the terrorists steal and then detonate one in Washingtion DC and Cheney ends up spitting out his dentures and giving GW a gumjob. Janet Reno scissors Condoleeza Rice, etc., etc.

If it's permanent, the gay bomb will be illegal according to the Geneva convention. You can't have a weapon that maims but doesn't kill. How will they be maimed? Well, I'm sure their browneyes will be.

Cullion
6th October 07, 07:40 PM
According to which part of the right wing? most neocons I've read about are just amoral big-government militarists, ex-socialists who've smelled the coffee and come in from the cold, nothing particularly puritanical about them.

In case you're wondering, yes that was a scathing critique.

NoMan
6th October 07, 10:14 PM
According to which part of the right wing? most neocons I've read about are just amoral big-government militarists, ex-socialists who've smelled the coffee and come in from the cold, nothing particularly puritanical about them.

In case you're wondering, yes that was a scathing critique.

The right-wingers of America form up what could be called "non-overlapping magisteria"" to use Stephen Gould's term. The neo-cons care about defense and money, but not much else. They think America should control all the World's resources, police the world, and turn in the World into our image, even if it means using economic policies that cripple nations and long-drawn out wars.

Then you have your libertarians. Libertarians don't care as much about defense, but they don't like social programs like welfare, medicaid, etc., or taxation. Libertarians are pro-abortion and (usually) for individual rights though.

Then you have Fundies, who just want us to kill Muslims, discriminate against gays, and recite the Bible before every meeting and inscribe "God Loves us" on everything the U.S. touches.

Then you have the paleocons. Paleos care about balanced budget, small government, and family value morality.

Since libertarians don't care about the size of our military, neo-cons get to run wild with it. Since fundies don't care about the military and are usually allied with wealthy business interests, they side with libertarians on fiscal issues, even though they disagree on social issues. But, libertarians don't care that much about social issues, whether or not evolution is taught in schools, if atheists are treated as second-class citizens, etc., is really irrelevant. They just want low taxes. They believe the only purpose of the government is defense.

The only group of conservatives who are really ticked off are the paleocons, because they see Bush Co. as a betrayal of conservative issues like small government and balanced budgets.

Meanwhile, there aren't any clear-defined boundaries for liberals. Some liberals are pro-gun control, some aren't. Some are pro-abortion, some aren't. Some are for balanced budgets, like Clinton was, some are for expansion of government programs regardless of costs. Some are for individual rights, some are against. Even though the Republican party has four different groups, they don't care about the same things, while the Democratic party has multiple opinions on a wide variety of subjects that overlap, making them look divided.

Personally, I think it's a strong argument for why we should have more than a two-party system given the wide divergence of opinions so we don't keep having a deadlocked Congress where they can't do shit but condemn a newspaper ad.

Stick
7th October 07, 01:35 AM
This is so old I could sell it to the Antique Threads shop just down the street.

And no, it isn't new to the UK, just you and the folks running the Ig Noble awards.

1994. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bomb) I was reading about this on message boards since before the message board that spawned the splinter group that became Bullshido existed.

Still, kudos on their peace prize!

Anna Kovacs
7th October 07, 07:15 AM
An LSD bomb would be much more crippling then an ecstasy bomb.

Cullion
7th October 07, 08:58 AM
The right-wingers of America form up what could be called "non-overlapping magisteria"" to use Stephen Gould's term. The neo-cons care about defense and money, but not much else. They think America should control all the World's resources, police the world, and turn in the World into our image, even if it means using economic policies that cripple nations and long-drawn out wars.

Then you have your libertarians. Libertarians don't care as much about defense, but they don't like social programs like welfare, medicaid, etc., or taxation. Libertarians are pro-abortion and (usually) for individual rights though.

Then you have Fundies, who just want us to kill Muslims, discriminate against gays, and recite the Bible before every meeting and inscribe "God Loves us" on everything the U.S. touches.

Then you have the paleocons. Paleos care about balanced budget, small government, and family value morality.

Since libertarians don't care about the size of our military, neo-cons get to run wild with it. Since fundies don't care about the military and are usually allied with wealthy business interests, they side with libertarians on fiscal issues, even though they disagree on social issues. But, libertarians don't care that much about social issues, whether or not evolution is taught in schools, if atheists are treated as second-class citizens, etc., is really irrelevant. They just want low taxes. They believe the only purpose of the government is defense.

The only group of conservatives who are really ticked off are the paleocons, because they see Bush Co. as a betrayal of conservative issues like small government and balanced budgets.

I'm a moderate Libertarian, and I wouldn't say that Libertarians 'don't care about the size of the military'.

I think the dividing line seperating Libertarians and Paleocons is very slim on a lot of issues, the main difference being a cultural one.

http://www.lewrockwell.com has articles by palecons and libertarians. They agree on most things. They're all in favour of less military adventurism, smaller government etc..

Paleoconservatives are generally religious and whilst not advocating government legislation of 'vices' tend to be pretty traditional and straight laced in their private lives. Libertarians tend not to be.

WarPhalange
7th October 07, 03:49 PM
An LSD bomb would be much more crippling then an ecstasy bomb.

I don't know, don't you like dehydrate from ecstacy or something?

But you actually have a good idea. Exploding an extacy bomb inside of an old folks' home. Or better yet, a math department building at a university. Can you imagine the horror that would ensue?

Anna Kovacs
7th October 07, 04:14 PM
Ecstasy will mildly raise your metabolism and make you sweat faster but you wont really seriously dehydrate unless you're dancing your ass off.

I think an LSD bomb would be an awesome idea because there is no fear like the world contracting into you you as all hell breaks loose and your mentally reduced to being a frightened 6 year old whose sense of reality is mauled to the point where you can't tell where your body is or even really what you are.

Anna Kovacs
7th October 07, 04:15 PM
Also the great thing about LSD is that the dose is in the micrograms so you can have a lot of it in liquid and then vaporize it into the air via an explosion kind of like a poison gas.

GuiltySpark
7th October 07, 05:02 PM
I love how bad the US war machine is afraid of homosexuals.

OMG why should we let filthy HOMOsexuals serve in the armed forces?!

Because their burried on the beaches of Normandy jerks.

WarPhalange
7th October 07, 09:26 PM
Zombie soldiers? FUCK YEAH!

Cullion
8th October 07, 10:43 AM
I'm not sure if I like the gay zombie soldier direction this thread is taking.

GuiltySpark
8th October 07, 10:56 AM
A buddy of mine did Extacy and his eyes loss focus or whats the right fucking word here? One eye would be looking straight and the other eye was 'lazy' i guess you could sa, kinda looking way downwards and off to the side. Took 2 days for it to fix itself.
Idiot also over time blew a hole in his heart and had to find a new job.

Probably a repost

NbvVLGskCQo



Caught this one too. It's a parody of the first, skip to about 2:30 into it.

9R-z34KOaQw

Shawarma
8th October 07, 11:47 AM
You're not getting the point of the bombs. They're actually designed to boost the morale and fighting spirit of American soldiers rather than harm the enemy. Think about it - would YOU want to surrender your sweet ass to an army full of raging newly de-closeted homos?

I think I'll just stay and fight, thank you.

Anna Kovacs
8th October 07, 12:35 PM
A buddy of mine did Extacy and his eyes loss focus or whats the right fucking word here? One eye would be looking straight and the other eye was 'lazy' i guess you could sa, kinda looking way downwards and off to the side. Took 2 days for it to fix itself.
Idiot also over time blew a hole in his heart and had to find a new job.



Eye wiggles. They're a common side effect, though usually not to bad. This is generally because pills are often cut with methamphetime to give them a "speedy" quality.

Straight MDMA is pure magic and much more relaxed then the speedy pills sold as "Ecstasy" most times.

Toby Christensen
8th October 07, 01:06 PM
I think the standard of person they let into the Australian Army can be disgraceful.

An ex soldier with SERIOUS issues went up to my friend (the one JFS didn't believe existed) and said "When are you going to take me home and fuck me?" Naturally she was very upset.

Unfortunately I weighed about 130lb in those days and was hypertonic or we could have taken turns kicking his macho little scrotum in.

On the other end of the spectrum we have my 6ft3 130kg cousin who is a hand to hand combat instructor (retired). You couldn't simply hang around the house, because he'd grab you and "kill" you with a neckbreak or a knife to the carotid.

My twin brother also spent time at the main barracks in Brisbane and the majority of it was used chatting to a mechanic known as Whitey who was borderline obese and too lazy to go to H2H lessons and too fat to crawl under some vehicles.